Case mathematics
4 dimensions · 100 pointsA correct figure delivered without its working cannot be checked, and one delivered without meaning leaves the interviewer to do the interpretation.
Six rubrics, four weighted dimensions each. The weights on this page come straight from the scoring code.
A case is not one skill. Losing on synthesis calls for a different correction from losing on arithmetic, and a single score hides which one happened. Each rubric therefore reports its dimensions separately, and names the one to fix first.
A correct figure delivered without its working cannot be checked, and one delivered without meaning leaves the interviewer to do the interpretation.
An interviewer follows a structure by ear. Coverage carries the most weight because a missing branch cannot be recovered later in the case.
Breadth and grouping are weighted equally: a long undifferentiated list and three well-chosen angles both fall short on their own.
The estimate matters less than the chain that produced it. The sanity check is scored separately because it is what separates a defensible number from a guess.
Reading a figure is the cheapest part. The implication carries the most weight, because an exhibit is only worth what it changes.
The recommendation is tested on the opening sentence alone. A conclusion that arrives last arrives after the interviewer has stopped listening.
Assessment is deterministic. The same answer always returns the same score and the same feedback, which makes results comparable across attempts. It also means the rubrics judge whether the expected moves are present, not whether a claim is true. A well-structured answer built on a false premise will score well here and fail in a room.
A human interviewer still reads what no rubric can: hesitation, the answer behind the answer, and whether you would be trusted in front of a client.
Every rubric above runs on the free drills, without an account.